Sexually Violent Persons Explainer

Welcome to this short explainer on Sexually Violent Persons.

Around twenty states operate SVP legislation which allows sex offenders to be committed to treatment facilities under civil law. They can be detained for as long as they are deemed to be a threat to others.

In order for an individual to be found to be a Sexually Violent Person, they need to meet the three prongs of the statute.

They must have committed a qualifying sex offense. This could be rape, sexual assault, or a range of child sexual offences.

They must also have a qualifying mental disorder that affects their emotional or volitional capacity.

The third prong is that, as a result of that mental disorder, they are substantially probable to commit future acts of sexual violence.

This is assessed by a clinical psychologist during a comprehensive evaluation and the findings are provided to the Attorney General’s office and the courts.

A decision is then made to either commit the individual to a treatment facility or release them.

A person is classed as “in remission” if they have not acted on urges arising from their disorder for a defined period (for example five years in a non-institutional setting) or where a suitably qualified psychologist determines their risk of reoffending is lower than the probability threshold.

Stay safe!

If you are not already a member, join Cold Case Live today to directly support the ongoing casework of the Cold Case Foundation and to help us develop this vital resource in the fight against serious crime.

$2.99 / Month (billed anually at $35.88)
Founders memberships paid annually save $1 a month!
Lifetime fixed price of $35.88 per year ($2.99 per month)
Full access to Cold Case Live
Exclusive access to content and courses
Pay Monthly
$3.99 / Month
Founders are granted access to exclusive content at a lifetime fixed price.
Lifetime fixed price of $3.99 per month
Full access to Cold Case Live
Exclusive access to content and courses

Related Articles


An SVP risk assessment has several components and areas that are carefully evaluated by the forensic expert. Studies have demonstrated that relying solely on the predictions of mental health professionals alone is less accurate than utilizing a more precise and sound approach, often referred to as an “adjusted actuarial approach” to evaluating the risk of recidivism of sexual offenders.

In The Blood

In The Blood: DNA testing truly is a complex and, for many, controversial topic area, set against a backdrop of global differences in approach to fundamental rights and freedoms which can make discussions like this too hot to touch. Nonetheless, there are still these much bigger discussions to be had around the way we use the power of DNA to prevent harm in society and that’s the real challenge here – getting to a point where the basic premise of the discussion is understood in its simplest form: a problem to solve. For me the conversation starts with that poor girl in the field. She deserves to be known. She deserves peace. In a world where her DNA was attributable to her, nearly forty years wouldn’t have passed. But sometimes solving one problem can create many more conflicts and it is important to appreciate that fully. This is the thing about investigative work. Sometimes, there’s just no easy answer. But we still have to talk about even the things we might not want to, calmly and rationally, because an unexplored avenue might be the one where the right answer lies.


Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *